Don Meyers Kimberly Gochnour
Daily Herald Public Health Educator
Editorial Editor 466 N. 400 E. #302
801-344-2544 Provo, Ut 84606
dmeyers@heraldextra.com Kimberly_gochnour7@hotmail.com
Opinion Editorial: HPV Vaccine
The health of the population hangs in the balance of the HPV vaccine. The HPV vaccine must be considered for mandatory immunization of all girls and women age 9 and up. The HPV vaccine prevents women from getting the Human Papillomavirus which causes 70% of all cervical cancer.
Many people may take the alternative view that the HPV vaccine does not need to become mandatory. Some concerns that parents have is the efficacy of a new vaccine. . Miranda Hitti reported that in a poll where parents were asked “whether they would support a state law that requires girls to receive the HPV vaccine before entering ninth grade”, 30% were neutral and 26% strongly disagreed. Some parents argue there isn’t enough clinical research and clinical trials done, however this is an invalid argument. The FDA has proven this vaccine “safe and effective” and the CDC is promoting its use and pushing to make it a mandatory vaccine.
The Pan-American Health Organization reports 500,000 new cases of cervical cancer diagnosed annually. Creating mandatory vaccination would prevent over 350,000 cases of cervical cancer annually.
The vaccination must be given by age 9 to catch girls before they become
sexually active and are at risk of acquiring HPV which can then lead to cervical cancer.
This is not a matter of “if” the girls become sexually active but “when” they
-MORE-
become sexually active. In 2005, 34% of students were sexually active by the time they reached high school according to the Child Trends Databank. And these girls must be protected against HPV before they do become sexually active.
So as public health advocates and parents concerned for the well-being of their daughters, this is a call to action for lawmakers to step up and support a bill requiring girls 9 and up to receive the HPV vaccine. Lawmakers this call to action is a plea to protect women against the debilitating disease of cervical cancer. As constituents it is imperative that this bill is lobbied for, supported and presented to Congress, and eventually signed into law to support the needs and wants of the people. If something is proven to work, prevent cancer, and save lives such as the HPV vaccine, then action must be taken by lawmakers to create mandatory immunization of girls and women age 9 and up.
XXX
Wednesday, June 20, 2007
Huntsman's Donation "Gard's" Against Cervical Cancer/Lesions-E-press release
FOR IMMEDIATE USE
May 31, 2007
Contact:
Kimberly Gochnour
466 N. 400 E.
Provo, Ut 84606
Kimberly_ gochnour7@hotmail.com
Huntsman’s Donation “Gard’s” Against Cervical Cancer/Lesions
Donation promotes HPV vaccine, Gardasil, to help prevent cervical cancer and cervical lesions in women.
Salt Lake City, Utah (PRWEB) ---- Jon and Karen Huntsman donate $1 million to the Utah Department of Health on April 5 to disperse HPV education and HPV vaccinations which prevent cervical cancer and cervical lesions.
After the state of Utah did not approve House Bill 358 proposing that $1 million be allocated to provide women whose insurance do not cover the HPV vaccine, Jon and Karen Huntsman took action. They donated $1 million to educating women in Utah about cervical cancer and providing the vaccine for those unable to receive it. “My quest in life and my pledge in death… is to assist the eradication of cancer in all its ugly mannerisms, irrespective of cause,” said Jon Huntsman, CEO of Huntsman Corp.
A study done by the New England Journal of Medicine proves that not only does the HPV vaccine, Gardasil, protect against cervical cancer but it also reduces the risk of cervical lesions in women. From this study researchers conclude that “98% of HPV-related high-grade cervical lesions” were prevented, according the NEJM. Out of 42 women in the placebo group only 1 woman received a cervical lesion.
-MORE-
In reference to cost the study also concluded that “Everyone who gets cancer goes through a pre-cancerous stage, we spend about $3 billion each year to find and treat these precancerous stages caused by some type of HPV,” said Kevin Ault, MD.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2003, approximately 11,820 women were diagnosed and 4,000 women died from cervical cancer. This high incidence of cervical cancer is exactly why Huntsman and supporters see the necessity in funding efforts to promote HPV vaccine
Cervical cancer and cervical lesions can both be prevented by the HPV vaccine. Cervical lesions rates in adolescent girls are increasing. The National Institute of Health reports that “adolescents with low and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions are about as likely as adults to have progressive disease”. Approximately out of “646 subjects 477 had low grade cervical lesions while 55 had high-grade cervical lesions,” according to Dr. Jason D. Wright, from Washington University.
For more information on the HPV vaccine, go to Gardasil.com.
About the Utah Department of Health:
The Utah Department of Health aims at keeping the residents of Utah healthy, through health programs to protect the public.
XXX
May 31, 2007
Contact:
Kimberly Gochnour
466 N. 400 E.
Provo, Ut 84606
Kimberly_ gochnour7@hotmail.com
Huntsman’s Donation “Gard’s” Against Cervical Cancer/Lesions
Donation promotes HPV vaccine, Gardasil, to help prevent cervical cancer and cervical lesions in women.
Salt Lake City, Utah (PRWEB) ---- Jon and Karen Huntsman donate $1 million to the Utah Department of Health on April 5 to disperse HPV education and HPV vaccinations which prevent cervical cancer and cervical lesions.
After the state of Utah did not approve House Bill 358 proposing that $1 million be allocated to provide women whose insurance do not cover the HPV vaccine, Jon and Karen Huntsman took action. They donated $1 million to educating women in Utah about cervical cancer and providing the vaccine for those unable to receive it. “My quest in life and my pledge in death… is to assist the eradication of cancer in all its ugly mannerisms, irrespective of cause,” said Jon Huntsman, CEO of Huntsman Corp.
A study done by the New England Journal of Medicine proves that not only does the HPV vaccine, Gardasil, protect against cervical cancer but it also reduces the risk of cervical lesions in women. From this study researchers conclude that “98% of HPV-related high-grade cervical lesions” were prevented, according the NEJM. Out of 42 women in the placebo group only 1 woman received a cervical lesion.
-MORE-
In reference to cost the study also concluded that “Everyone who gets cancer goes through a pre-cancerous stage, we spend about $3 billion each year to find and treat these precancerous stages caused by some type of HPV,” said Kevin Ault, MD.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2003, approximately 11,820 women were diagnosed and 4,000 women died from cervical cancer. This high incidence of cervical cancer is exactly why Huntsman and supporters see the necessity in funding efforts to promote HPV vaccine
Cervical cancer and cervical lesions can both be prevented by the HPV vaccine. Cervical lesions rates in adolescent girls are increasing. The National Institute of Health reports that “adolescents with low and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions are about as likely as adults to have progressive disease”. Approximately out of “646 subjects 477 had low grade cervical lesions while 55 had high-grade cervical lesions,” according to Dr. Jason D. Wright, from Washington University.
For more information on the HPV vaccine, go to Gardasil.com.
About the Utah Department of Health:
The Utah Department of Health aims at keeping the residents of Utah healthy, through health programs to protect the public.
XXX
Opinion Editorial: Thimerosal in Vaccine’s Does Not Cause Autism
DESERET NEWS
Jay Evenson
Health Reporter
801-237-2180
even@desnews.com
Opinion Editorial: Thimerosal in Vaccine’s Does Not Cause Autism
Autism is a heart wrenching and life long disease that brings about many challenges to the family. Because children with autism lack the ability to function normally in society, the parents undertake an entirely new role involving health care, socialization, and education. So the debate revolves around the decision to vaccinate children with the controversial vaccination accused of causing autism.
In order to resolve the controversial issue, there have been numerous studies done on the correlation of autism and the MMR vaccine which contains thimerosal. Although it’s been years since researchers have proved there is no correlation between autism and vaccines, parents still fear that there is a direct relation between autism and the vaccines containing thimerosal. The rampant fear among parents might be manifested by the state of Utah’s mere 74 percent of immunized children, which falls behind the national average. This social issue hits close to home as local parents hesitate to vaccinate their children based upon the fear of developing autism.
A recent study in 2004 by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) concluded that there is no link between autism and MMR vaccine or vaccines that contain thimerosal as a preservative, thus providing factual evidence to calm fears of many parents. The study found that the percentage of children with autism that received the MMR vaccine was the same as the children that didn’t have autism and received the vaccine.
The benefits of giving children vaccines far out weigh the possibility of developing serious diseases. Children live longer and are healthier because of vaccines that they received in their childhood years. Before the Childhood Immunization Program in the United States, 13 to 20,000 kids developed paralytic polio every year. Prior to the development of the measles vaccination, almost everyone in the country got measles when they were a child, leading to the death of 450 children every year. Before rubella, epidemics occurred and sometimes up to 20,000 children were born with congenital rubella syndrome with 2,000 deaths and more than 1,000 miscarriages. This evidence provides hope for those concerned about vaccinations.
Along with the recent positive statistics, technology has also evolved allowing vaccines to progress. They no longer need to carry thimerosal which has been argued to cause autism. Thimerosal keeps bacteria from contaminating a vaccine and its presence is essential for larger concentrations. Because of these findings, it has caused vaccines to be packaged as single doses, which in turn causes it to be more expensive; however, it is worth the cost if it keeps parents from worrying and helping them make the smarter decision to immunize their children.
While parents face a difficult decision whether or not to vaccinate their child, evidence supported by statistics has proven to be safe and effective. It remains critical that policy makers implement a national policy supporting the vaccination of children. Its far safer for the general public to receive vaccines than to run the risk of contracting serious diseases.
Jay Evenson
Health Reporter
801-237-2180
even@desnews.com
Opinion Editorial: Thimerosal in Vaccine’s Does Not Cause Autism
Autism is a heart wrenching and life long disease that brings about many challenges to the family. Because children with autism lack the ability to function normally in society, the parents undertake an entirely new role involving health care, socialization, and education. So the debate revolves around the decision to vaccinate children with the controversial vaccination accused of causing autism.
In order to resolve the controversial issue, there have been numerous studies done on the correlation of autism and the MMR vaccine which contains thimerosal. Although it’s been years since researchers have proved there is no correlation between autism and vaccines, parents still fear that there is a direct relation between autism and the vaccines containing thimerosal. The rampant fear among parents might be manifested by the state of Utah’s mere 74 percent of immunized children, which falls behind the national average. This social issue hits close to home as local parents hesitate to vaccinate their children based upon the fear of developing autism.
A recent study in 2004 by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) concluded that there is no link between autism and MMR vaccine or vaccines that contain thimerosal as a preservative, thus providing factual evidence to calm fears of many parents. The study found that the percentage of children with autism that received the MMR vaccine was the same as the children that didn’t have autism and received the vaccine.
The benefits of giving children vaccines far out weigh the possibility of developing serious diseases. Children live longer and are healthier because of vaccines that they received in their childhood years. Before the Childhood Immunization Program in the United States, 13 to 20,000 kids developed paralytic polio every year. Prior to the development of the measles vaccination, almost everyone in the country got measles when they were a child, leading to the death of 450 children every year. Before rubella, epidemics occurred and sometimes up to 20,000 children were born with congenital rubella syndrome with 2,000 deaths and more than 1,000 miscarriages. This evidence provides hope for those concerned about vaccinations.
Along with the recent positive statistics, technology has also evolved allowing vaccines to progress. They no longer need to carry thimerosal which has been argued to cause autism. Thimerosal keeps bacteria from contaminating a vaccine and its presence is essential for larger concentrations. Because of these findings, it has caused vaccines to be packaged as single doses, which in turn causes it to be more expensive; however, it is worth the cost if it keeps parents from worrying and helping them make the smarter decision to immunize their children.
While parents face a difficult decision whether or not to vaccinate their child, evidence supported by statistics has proven to be safe and effective. It remains critical that policy makers implement a national policy supporting the vaccination of children. Its far safer for the general public to receive vaccines than to run the risk of contracting serious diseases.
Exposure to Thimersol in the Womb Does Not Raise Risk of Autism
Exposure to Thimersol in the Womb Does Not Raise Risk of Autism
According to recent studies, vaccines containing mercury that are given to women in the last months of pregnancy who have a Rh negative blood type has been proven that there is no link between autism and thimersol.
The suggestion that the Rh protein injection containing thimersol that is commonly given to Rh negative women during late months of pregnancy has been linked to causing autism.
The Rh protein shot is given to women who lack protein on the surface of their red blood cells. By pregnant women receiving this shot it prevents Rh disease which can cause stillborns or illnesses in infants. Researchers from the University of Missouri stated, “We hypothesized that if thimerosal were associated with the development of autism, we would find a higher proportion of Rh negative mothers of children with autism born before 2002.”
To test whether or not thimersol caused autism in children, researchers took 214 mothers who had children with an autism disorder and looked to see if the mother was Rh negative and had been given the Rh protein vaccine WebMD late pregnancy.
The status of the mothers with autistic children were found to be no higher than those mothers with a Rh negative status The autistic children were not exposed thimersol-containing Rh vaccine prior to birth.
Although there is valid proof that the thimersol containing vaccine does not cause autism, it won’t change the minds of those that are convinced. Miles tells WebMD, “there is still no credible scientific proof or a link.” In 2004 the Institute of Medicine reviewed the data and came to the same conclusions. Miles concluded by saying, “It is time to move on and focus our research dollars and efforts on avenues that will be more productive.”
Children in the US are not exposed to the Rh vaccine (WebMD) and other vaccines that used to include thimersol. While children in other parts of the world are still being exposed to thimersal it is continuing to be used because it is an inexpensive preservative.
For more information on exposure to thimerosal, please visit WebMD.
About WebMD:
WebMD provides expertise in journalism, medicine, health communication and content to bring the best health information. There Independent Medical Review Board is continually reviewing the site for accuracy and timeliness.
According to recent studies, vaccines containing mercury that are given to women in the last months of pregnancy who have a Rh negative blood type has been proven that there is no link between autism and thimersol.
The suggestion that the Rh protein injection containing thimersol that is commonly given to Rh negative women during late months of pregnancy has been linked to causing autism.
The Rh protein shot is given to women who lack protein on the surface of their red blood cells. By pregnant women receiving this shot it prevents Rh disease which can cause stillborns or illnesses in infants. Researchers from the University of Missouri stated, “We hypothesized that if thimerosal were associated with the development of autism, we would find a higher proportion of Rh negative mothers of children with autism born before 2002.”
To test whether or not thimersol caused autism in children, researchers took 214 mothers who had children with an autism disorder and looked to see if the mother was Rh negative and had been given the Rh protein vaccine WebMD late pregnancy.
The status of the mothers with autistic children were found to be no higher than those mothers with a Rh negative status The autistic children were not exposed thimersol-containing Rh vaccine prior to birth.
Although there is valid proof that the thimersol containing vaccine does not cause autism, it won’t change the minds of those that are convinced. Miles tells WebMD, “there is still no credible scientific proof or a link.” In 2004 the Institute of Medicine reviewed the data and came to the same conclusions. Miles concluded by saying, “It is time to move on and focus our research dollars and efforts on avenues that will be more productive.”
Children in the US are not exposed to the Rh vaccine (WebMD) and other vaccines that used to include thimersol. While children in other parts of the world are still being exposed to thimersal it is continuing to be used because it is an inexpensive preservative.
For more information on exposure to thimerosal, please visit WebMD.
About WebMD:
WebMD provides expertise in journalism, medicine, health communication and content to bring the best health information. There Independent Medical Review Board is continually reviewing the site for accuracy and timeliness.
Monday, June 18, 2007
Maybe it’s more than just a phase
Autism has risen from 1 in 1500 to 1 in 150 in five years—that is ten times as many children being diagnosed per year. The cause of the dramatic increase (much like the cause of disease itself) is unknown. However, treatment for the childhood is available and with parents’ help the effects of the disease can be lessened.
Some think autism is not a helpable problem. Children with the disease must live with the disease and the consequences. People who think nothing can be done for the children, don’t take proactive behavior personally or in a classroom.
Not all autism cases go undetected. There are parents who notice something is wrong take children in to the doctor for a diagnosis. Once the disorder is addressed, parents work with their child to understand the problem and what can be done.
There are many treatments for autism spectrum disorder because the disorder is not the same for individuals. Some of the treatments include, speech therapy, behavior modification and vision therapy. Dr. Ivar Lovaas, founder of one behavior modification program says, “If a child can not learn the way we teach we must teach in a way the child can learn”. Vision therapy helps those unable to visually "hold still" to rely on a constant scanning of visual information to find out meaning.
Within the education system understanding and help can be given for further development. Treating autism is not pampering, “dumbing down,” or segregating children. It is using knowledge of the disorder to understand when and how to push each child toward different goals.
Every child, autistic or not, has certain needs that must be met in order to reach full potential, but it is in light of the growing trend in autistic children that special attention must be paid.
# # #
More Help For Autistic Children and Their Families
Autism rates are higher than rates of Cerebral Palsy, hearing loss, and vision impairment, but students with the disease makes up only about 3% of special education placements in public schools, according to studies done by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Why this disparity? If autism is an obvious health concern, then why is it lowest on the list? Now is the time to make it a higher priority. Right now the United States Senate is deliberating over the 2007 TEACH Act (HR 2390). This bill would provide refundable tax credits for teachers to get training for teaching students with autism. With this act in place, parents of autistic children would have a huge resource for their children in public schools. It would open up a resource that is available to all of the public and in every school. All parents could afford it and have access to it. Senators and all citizens, please support this bill so that it will pass! The benefits far outweigh any potential drawbacks.
Yes, this bill would cost money, but it is important to note that prevention, or in this case early intervention, saves money. As of now, nationally, autism costs the nation $90 billion every year, according to the University of Utah. Shouldn’t this be enough incentive to increase interventions? In addition, children’s parents who would not have sought help or known to will receive help earlier. This will save both the parents and the government money by helping to avoid potential problems in the future due to a lack of early treatment.
Autism continues to be on the rise, especially in Utah. Utah ranks almost highest in the nation for overall rates and leads the country in rates of late-onset autism, according to data from Utah State University. This means that there are many people who have the condition but don’t know what to do about it. They grow up with problems that affect them in school, work, and relationships, but do not receive help. Who knows how much more difficulty and money it costs in missed work and lost wages? If this bill passes, many, many more people with autism will receive care early and regularly, setting them further on the path to success.
Help those who suffer with autism and their families. Help this bill to pass by supporting it and voting for it in the senate. Bring about this change so that all affected students can receive help and costs can be reduced nationally and for individuals.
Yes, this bill would cost money, but it is important to note that prevention, or in this case early intervention, saves money. As of now, nationally, autism costs the nation $90 billion every year, according to the University of Utah. Shouldn’t this be enough incentive to increase interventions? In addition, children’s parents who would not have sought help or known to will receive help earlier. This will save both the parents and the government money by helping to avoid potential problems in the future due to a lack of early treatment.
Autism continues to be on the rise, especially in Utah. Utah ranks almost highest in the nation for overall rates and leads the country in rates of late-onset autism, according to data from Utah State University. This means that there are many people who have the condition but don’t know what to do about it. They grow up with problems that affect them in school, work, and relationships, but do not receive help. Who knows how much more difficulty and money it costs in missed work and lost wages? If this bill passes, many, many more people with autism will receive care early and regularly, setting them further on the path to success.
Help those who suffer with autism and their families. Help this bill to pass by supporting it and voting for it in the senate. Bring about this change so that all affected students can receive help and costs can be reduced nationally and for individuals.
Autism Rates in Utah Soar
Current rates of autism in Utah are among the highest in the nation and are growing at an astounding rate, costing millions of dollars.
Salt Lake City, UT. May 25, 2007--Among several states examined, Utah came out as having the third highest incidence of autism, and has a rate of autism 20 times higher than 20 years ago, according to a CDC study conducted. This high incidence rate of autism is pricey and is expected to cost millions of dollars, possibly billions. Research, however, offers some hope in the future.
1 in 133 children in Utah has autism, according to the CDC this year. In addition, this rate is 20 times higher than it was two decades ago. These high rates of autism cost Utah millions of dollars every year and it is estimated that costs for children diagnosed in Utah will be well over $20 billion over their lifetimes, according to Dr. Judith P. Zimmerman at the University of Utah. “Add into the equation the significant emotional strain placed on families and you will begin to understand why autism is an urgent public health issue and is believed by many people to be an epidemic.” added Zimmerman in a recent Press release.
The cause of autism is not known, but researchers are working hard on finding clues. The University of Utah, in collaboration with other institutions, is currently conducting the Autism Genome Project (AGP). Among other projects, they have identified a gene called neurexin 1, which may make its carriers more susceptible to autism. Researchers working on the APG are using a new technology called gene chip technology, which allows for genes to be out in a microchip, which allows researchers to compare thousands of DNA markers and compare chromosome regions shared by people with autism. This research is very important to autism. “By combining cutting-edge CNV analysis with more traditional linkage and association (analyses), the scientists now have a promising new framework to look for autism susceptibility genes,” says Andy Shih, the chief science officer for the national organization Autism Speaks, in a recent press release.
Until causes are determined and possibly a cure for autism, the CDC recommends that parents observe their children and watch for warning signs for autism. These warning signs include repeating words over and over instead of using regular language, avoiding eye contact, and trouble relating to others a complete list of warning signs can be found on the CDC website at http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/.
# # #
Salt Lake City, UT. May 25, 2007--Among several states examined, Utah came out as having the third highest incidence of autism, and has a rate of autism 20 times higher than 20 years ago, according to a CDC study conducted. This high incidence rate of autism is pricey and is expected to cost millions of dollars, possibly billions. Research, however, offers some hope in the future.
1 in 133 children in Utah has autism, according to the CDC this year. In addition, this rate is 20 times higher than it was two decades ago. These high rates of autism cost Utah millions of dollars every year and it is estimated that costs for children diagnosed in Utah will be well over $20 billion over their lifetimes, according to Dr. Judith P. Zimmerman at the University of Utah. “Add into the equation the significant emotional strain placed on families and you will begin to understand why autism is an urgent public health issue and is believed by many people to be an epidemic.” added Zimmerman in a recent Press release.
The cause of autism is not known, but researchers are working hard on finding clues. The University of Utah, in collaboration with other institutions, is currently conducting the Autism Genome Project (AGP). Among other projects, they have identified a gene called neurexin 1, which may make its carriers more susceptible to autism. Researchers working on the APG are using a new technology called gene chip technology, which allows for genes to be out in a microchip, which allows researchers to compare thousands of DNA markers and compare chromosome regions shared by people with autism. This research is very important to autism. “By combining cutting-edge CNV analysis with more traditional linkage and association (analyses), the scientists now have a promising new framework to look for autism susceptibility genes,” says Andy Shih, the chief science officer for the national organization Autism Speaks, in a recent press release.
Until causes are determined and possibly a cure for autism, the CDC recommends that parents observe their children and watch for warning signs for autism. These warning signs include repeating words over and over instead of using regular language, avoiding eye contact, and trouble relating to others a complete list of warning signs can be found on the CDC website at http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/.
# # #
Cervical Cancer-Is It Preventable For Utah Women?
There is a vaccine that is being hailed as breakthrough for cervical cancer. It guards against the human papillomavirus infection which is the sole cause of cervical cancer. The U.S. is estimated to have 4,000 deaths each year from cervical cancer. The cost to treat this virus is estimated second only to HIV or human immunodeficient virus. Now Senator Bennett and Senator Hatch, is your chance to make a difference in the lives of the women whom you serve.
The Health Care Foundation of Great Kansas City has announced that it will help low-income girls and young women between the ages of 9-26 receive this new vaccine. “Missouri has become a national leader in preventing cervical cancer among its residents,” cited Mary Lou Jaramillo, a member of the board with Kansas City Health Care Foundation. Utah could be the next to catch the vision on helping girls and young women have a better chance of avoiding cervical cancer.
Opposition to this new vaccine has declared that the price of this vaccine is much too high for the average consumer. However when compared to the price of actually treating cervical cancer, $360-the total cost of the vaccine, does not look quite as high.
The opposition argues that this vaccine gives individuals a false notion of safety
-more-
against cervical cancer. This vaccine will not replace routine pap smears and is not
considered as a sole preventative measure against cervical cancer. It is another step of prevention and not a cure. Lobbying for a bill that will enable the HPV vaccine to be enrolled as a routine vaccine would be an effective way of reaching the vaccine’s target audience because 73% of Utah’s children receive their needed vaccines.
A recent study found that more than 20 different HPV types are associated with cervical cancer, and because of this, an implementation of a cancer-prevention vaccine is extremely important. Cervical cancer destroys the lives of thousands of women in the state. It leaves children motherless and father’s widows. This vaccine will help individual families, communities, corporations, and in turn help build a healthier generation. A chance to help prevent this cruel disease is at your feet, Senator Bennett and Hatch.
###
The Health Care Foundation of Great Kansas City has announced that it will help low-income girls and young women between the ages of 9-26 receive this new vaccine. “Missouri has become a national leader in preventing cervical cancer among its residents,” cited Mary Lou Jaramillo, a member of the board with Kansas City Health Care Foundation. Utah could be the next to catch the vision on helping girls and young women have a better chance of avoiding cervical cancer.
Opposition to this new vaccine has declared that the price of this vaccine is much too high for the average consumer. However when compared to the price of actually treating cervical cancer, $360-the total cost of the vaccine, does not look quite as high.
The opposition argues that this vaccine gives individuals a false notion of safety
-more-
against cervical cancer. This vaccine will not replace routine pap smears and is not
considered as a sole preventative measure against cervical cancer. It is another step of prevention and not a cure. Lobbying for a bill that will enable the HPV vaccine to be enrolled as a routine vaccine would be an effective way of reaching the vaccine’s target audience because 73% of Utah’s children receive their needed vaccines.
A recent study found that more than 20 different HPV types are associated with cervical cancer, and because of this, an implementation of a cancer-prevention vaccine is extremely important. Cervical cancer destroys the lives of thousands of women in the state. It leaves children motherless and father’s widows. This vaccine will help individual families, communities, corporations, and in turn help build a healthier generation. A chance to help prevent this cruel disease is at your feet, Senator Bennett and Hatch.
###
Xylitol-Why It Is In Your Gum
Utah Voters continue to be divided on fluoridated water; recent studies have shown that a middle ground for both sides could be found through the benefits of xylitol sweetened gum. The benefits of xylitol have been proven to reduce the risk of dental cavities in children and adults.
Provo, UT (PRWEB) May 21, 2007-Tooth Decay rates in Utah continue to be among the highest in the nation; however recent scientific evidence shows that xylitol can prevent and in some cases rebuild damaged teeth.
So what is Xylitol? Xylitol is a natural sweetener that has a similar molecular structure to that of sugar. It has fewer calories per grams than sugar and shares a similar taste. Only 51% of Utah citizens have drinking water with levels of fluoride that are capable of preventing tooth decay. While 58% of children in Utah, six through eight years old, have at least one filling or an untreated cavity. These statistics are among the highest in the nation.
Xylitol sweetened candy or gum has been proven effective in stopping tooth decay. The International Dental Journal has published several research studies citing that xylitol not only stops tooth decay from occurring but also contributes to remineralization of the teeth. These papers can be found at FDI World Dental. Xylitol should be considered, “as part of an overall strategy for tooth decay reduction,” as cited by the California Dental Association.
The barriers facing Utah residents’ adoption of xylitol include the high prices of xylitol sweetened products. There is also an absence of products that could be recommended in private practice settings because of the slow adoption of xylitol’s
-more-
benefits. Current marketers see xylitol as a product to potential consumers and not as a preventative agent.
The most effective products containing xylitol is primarily chewing gum but the cost per day is quiet high. Most products containing xylitol are poorly labeled so consumers and dentist cannot judge properly whether they should be advocated. Bulk purchases are the only way that the Utah can benefit because then the products could be purchased at a lower price and thus, easier to distribute among low income families.
Private dentists who are hired to treat low income mothers and their children in Oregon have been using xylitol as part of the dental treatment, but compliance rates are low and they advocate that their needs to be more research done on the methods that would be most effective.
Xylitol sweetened gum is not included on the formulary of Medicaid. The National Institute of Health consensus conference in March of 2001 was the first to recommend xylitol for the fight against tooth decay. The American Dental Association has not released a formal statement on the use of xylitol but the American Academy of pediatric Dentistry is developing one. These are the main reasons that it is unlikely that government insurance programs will feel impelled to provide low cost access to xylitol containing products, despite recent successful studies about the benefits of xylitol.
Dr. Larry Bybee is an accomplished Dentist who has published several articles on xylitol and is available for questions concerning xylitol and its effectiveness.
Contact:
Dr. Larry Bybee
Email: larrybybee@kiddsdental.com
###
Provo, UT (PRWEB) May 21, 2007-Tooth Decay rates in Utah continue to be among the highest in the nation; however recent scientific evidence shows that xylitol can prevent and in some cases rebuild damaged teeth.
So what is Xylitol? Xylitol is a natural sweetener that has a similar molecular structure to that of sugar. It has fewer calories per grams than sugar and shares a similar taste. Only 51% of Utah citizens have drinking water with levels of fluoride that are capable of preventing tooth decay. While 58% of children in Utah, six through eight years old, have at least one filling or an untreated cavity. These statistics are among the highest in the nation.
Xylitol sweetened candy or gum has been proven effective in stopping tooth decay. The International Dental Journal has published several research studies citing that xylitol not only stops tooth decay from occurring but also contributes to remineralization of the teeth. These papers can be found at FDI World Dental. Xylitol should be considered, “as part of an overall strategy for tooth decay reduction,” as cited by the California Dental Association.
The barriers facing Utah residents’ adoption of xylitol include the high prices of xylitol sweetened products. There is also an absence of products that could be recommended in private practice settings because of the slow adoption of xylitol’s
-more-
benefits. Current marketers see xylitol as a product to potential consumers and not as a preventative agent.
The most effective products containing xylitol is primarily chewing gum but the cost per day is quiet high. Most products containing xylitol are poorly labeled so consumers and dentist cannot judge properly whether they should be advocated. Bulk purchases are the only way that the Utah can benefit because then the products could be purchased at a lower price and thus, easier to distribute among low income families.
Private dentists who are hired to treat low income mothers and their children in Oregon have been using xylitol as part of the dental treatment, but compliance rates are low and they advocate that their needs to be more research done on the methods that would be most effective.
Xylitol sweetened gum is not included on the formulary of Medicaid. The National Institute of Health consensus conference in March of 2001 was the first to recommend xylitol for the fight against tooth decay. The American Dental Association has not released a formal statement on the use of xylitol but the American Academy of pediatric Dentistry is developing one. These are the main reasons that it is unlikely that government insurance programs will feel impelled to provide low cost access to xylitol containing products, despite recent successful studies about the benefits of xylitol.
Dr. Larry Bybee is an accomplished Dentist who has published several articles on xylitol and is available for questions concerning xylitol and its effectiveness.
Contact:
Dr. Larry Bybee
Email: larrybybee@kiddsdental.com
###
Saturday, June 16, 2007
Opinion Editorial: HPV Vaccine- Needed by Utah Teens
While the rest of the United States debates the need for a mandatory HPV vaccine, Utah remains relatively silent. Clinical trials show that the HPV vaccination, Gardasil, is 100% effective at protecting against HPV strains 16 and 18, the strains that cause 70% of cervical cancer cases. If these counter measures are available why hasn’t Utah warmed up to the idea?
In theory the HPV vaccine sounds wonderful. It protects against cervical cancer, a devastating illness that the American Cancer Society estimates kills approximately 4,000 U.S women annually. But there has to be something more: why would a caring parent resist protecting their child against cancer later in life? Why would the State Legislature reject a bill that would donate $1 million to the state health department to provide Gardasil for those girls that need it? Parents oppose Gardasil because HPV is a sexually transmitted disease: most parents feel that their child will not engage in risky premature sexual behavior. However, new data shows that Utah teens are sexually active.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Utah has one of the fastest growing rates of chlamydia in the United States. From 2000 to 2005 Utah experienced a 110% increase in the number of chlamydia cases. The number of cases is still below the national average, but if the rate of increase remains constant, Utah will become one of the front-runners for chlamydia within the next ten years. According to the Utah County Department of Health the age group with the highest rates of chlamydia in the state is the 15-24 age group. While this group does include college students a majority of the cases are found in those under 20.Today the connection between chlamydia and HPV is coming to light; the CDC estimates that approximately 46% of women with HPV also have chlamydia.
What does this data mean for parents and Utah lawmakers? It means that the HPV vaccine is needed here in Utah. Condoms are not 100% effective in preventing HPV, but the vaccine is. Here in Utah, like other states, teens are having sex, many without their parents’ knowledge. even more importantly, teens are contracting sexually transmitted diseases that can impact their health later in life.
Laws are made to protect children against a variety of situations. As parents and lawmakers we need to take action to bring another bill before the Utah State Legislature that will provide funding for adequate education, prevention and vaccination against HPV and cervical cancer.
In theory the HPV vaccine sounds wonderful. It protects against cervical cancer, a devastating illness that the American Cancer Society estimates kills approximately 4,000 U.S women annually. But there has to be something more: why would a caring parent resist protecting their child against cancer later in life? Why would the State Legislature reject a bill that would donate $1 million to the state health department to provide Gardasil for those girls that need it? Parents oppose Gardasil because HPV is a sexually transmitted disease: most parents feel that their child will not engage in risky premature sexual behavior. However, new data shows that Utah teens are sexually active.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Utah has one of the fastest growing rates of chlamydia in the United States. From 2000 to 2005 Utah experienced a 110% increase in the number of chlamydia cases. The number of cases is still below the national average, but if the rate of increase remains constant, Utah will become one of the front-runners for chlamydia within the next ten years. According to the Utah County Department of Health the age group with the highest rates of chlamydia in the state is the 15-24 age group. While this group does include college students a majority of the cases are found in those under 20.Today the connection between chlamydia and HPV is coming to light; the CDC estimates that approximately 46% of women with HPV also have chlamydia.
What does this data mean for parents and Utah lawmakers? It means that the HPV vaccine is needed here in Utah. Condoms are not 100% effective in preventing HPV, but the vaccine is. Here in Utah, like other states, teens are having sex, many without their parents’ knowledge. even more importantly, teens are contracting sexually transmitted diseases that can impact their health later in life.
Laws are made to protect children against a variety of situations. As parents and lawmakers we need to take action to bring another bill before the Utah State Legislature that will provide funding for adequate education, prevention and vaccination against HPV and cervical cancer.
Thursday, June 14, 2007
New Jersey Lawmakers Push New Autism Legislation
New Jersey Senators have introduced bills in an effort to deal with their state having the highest rate of autism, providing medical professionals, parents and teachers more resources and information to better help those affected with the disease.
Trenton, New Jersey (PRWEB) May 30, 2007 – In lieu of the Center for Disease Control’s pegging New Jersey with the highest autism rates in the nation, the New Jersey Senate health committee released a package of bills designed to help several thousand individuals affected by Autism.
In New Jersey 1 in 94 children have autism. Utah is also among the states with high rates of autism, coming in third with 1 in every 133 children being affected.
The prevalence of autism is growing every year and with it comes a need for knowledge and action. “We used to think it was such a rare disorder,” University of Utah psychologist Sally Ozonoff said. “Now it’s turning out to be one of the most common developmental disorders. Everyone needs to know about it.”
This is exactly what New Jersey is seeking to do. They are the first state to introduce new autism legislation since the CDC released their statistics last February.
“As of February, 2007, the federal Centers for Disease Control identified New Jersey as having the highest rate of autism incidence in the nation,” said Senator Loretta Weinberg. “With our increased understanding of the spectrum of autism disorders comes the increased responsibility of providing a support system for families and individuals living with autism in the Garden State.”
The package of bills would establish a statewide autism registry, restructure a state research and treatment council, train teachers in autism awareness, instruct physicians in early detection, create the task force on adult autism and provide more money for research and treatment.
According to the CDC, autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are a group of developmental disabilities defined by significant impairments in social interaction and communication and presence of unusual behaviors and interests. The disorder begins before the age of three and last the person’s entire life.
“While New Jersey has done a lot to help children with autism, many times the
-more-
support dries up when those children transition into adulthood,” Weinberg said. “In some
of the most severe cases of autism, individuals need structured support for their entire lives.”
While there is no known cause or cure of autism, experts agree that a heightened awareness and early detection are important to helping those with the disease. Intensive therapies including behavioral, occupational, speech and physical show promise in lessening the severity of symptoms.
Trenton, New Jersey (PRWEB) May 30, 2007 – In lieu of the Center for Disease Control’s pegging New Jersey with the highest autism rates in the nation, the New Jersey Senate health committee released a package of bills designed to help several thousand individuals affected by Autism.
In New Jersey 1 in 94 children have autism. Utah is also among the states with high rates of autism, coming in third with 1 in every 133 children being affected.
The prevalence of autism is growing every year and with it comes a need for knowledge and action. “We used to think it was such a rare disorder,” University of Utah psychologist Sally Ozonoff said. “Now it’s turning out to be one of the most common developmental disorders. Everyone needs to know about it.”
This is exactly what New Jersey is seeking to do. They are the first state to introduce new autism legislation since the CDC released their statistics last February.
“As of February, 2007, the federal Centers for Disease Control identified New Jersey as having the highest rate of autism incidence in the nation,” said Senator Loretta Weinberg. “With our increased understanding of the spectrum of autism disorders comes the increased responsibility of providing a support system for families and individuals living with autism in the Garden State.”
The package of bills would establish a statewide autism registry, restructure a state research and treatment council, train teachers in autism awareness, instruct physicians in early detection, create the task force on adult autism and provide more money for research and treatment.
According to the CDC, autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are a group of developmental disabilities defined by significant impairments in social interaction and communication and presence of unusual behaviors and interests. The disorder begins before the age of three and last the person’s entire life.
“While New Jersey has done a lot to help children with autism, many times the
-more-
support dries up when those children transition into adulthood,” Weinberg said. “In some
of the most severe cases of autism, individuals need structured support for their entire lives.”
While there is no known cause or cure of autism, experts agree that a heightened awareness and early detection are important to helping those with the disease. Intensive therapies including behavioral, occupational, speech and physical show promise in lessening the severity of symptoms.
Opinion Editorial: Autism – Needed Action to Combat a Crisis
Despite Utah having the third highest rate of autism in the United States, many don’t seem to think it is necessary to broaden Utah’s scope of autism awareness, research and action programs to help those affected by the disease.
Autism is a serious condition, effecting thousands of Utahans. In February of 2007 the Center for Disease Control (CDC) said one in every 133 children born in Utah will be autistic. Yet Utah legislators haven’t taken any action or reacted in any way to the new data. No bills have been introduced, and it seems no steps are being taken to respond to the crisis.
There also seems to be more of an interest among the general public in defining exactly what causes autism, or trying to come up with a reason why Utah has such a high rate of the disease. These fruitless attempts to find an explanation detract from the more pertinent and needed actions of early detection and programs that will help those affected by the disorder. All this energy is wasted and still there has not been a scientific study to pin down a cause for the disease.
Yet still so many of the discussions surrounding autism speculate into immunizations as the definite cause. This is ridiculous hearsay backed up by nothing more than pessimistic speculation. According to the Center for Disease Control, “The weight of currently available scientific evidence does not support the hypothesis that vaccines cause autism.”
According to the CDC autism is a group of developmental disabilities defined by significant impairments in social interaction and communication and presence of unusual behaviors and interests.
New Jersey, the state with the highest rate of autism, is already taking steps in the right direction, unlike Utah. A set of new bills will establish a statewide autism registry, restructure a state research and treatment council, train teachers in autism awareness, instruct physicians in early detection, create the task force on adult autism and provide money for research and treatment.
“As of February 2007, the Centers for Disease Control identified New Jersey as having the highest rate of autism incidence in the nation,” said New Jersey Senator Loretta Weinberg. “With our increased understanding of the spectrum of autism disorders comes the increased responsibility of providing a support system for families and individuals living with autism.”
This heightened sense of responsibility needs to be spanned across the nation, especially in those states with the highest rates. While there is no cure for the disease, intensive therapies including behavioral, occupational, speech and physical show promise in lessening the severity of the symptoms.
This is where the focus needs to be, this is where the successes will come. Speculating into different causes without scientific reasoning, and ignoring the severity of the issue is what our state doesn’t need. Our apathy on this issue will only make things worse. It is in your hands.
Autism is a serious condition, effecting thousands of Utahans. In February of 2007 the Center for Disease Control (CDC) said one in every 133 children born in Utah will be autistic. Yet Utah legislators haven’t taken any action or reacted in any way to the new data. No bills have been introduced, and it seems no steps are being taken to respond to the crisis.
There also seems to be more of an interest among the general public in defining exactly what causes autism, or trying to come up with a reason why Utah has such a high rate of the disease. These fruitless attempts to find an explanation detract from the more pertinent and needed actions of early detection and programs that will help those affected by the disorder. All this energy is wasted and still there has not been a scientific study to pin down a cause for the disease.
Yet still so many of the discussions surrounding autism speculate into immunizations as the definite cause. This is ridiculous hearsay backed up by nothing more than pessimistic speculation. According to the Center for Disease Control, “The weight of currently available scientific evidence does not support the hypothesis that vaccines cause autism.”
According to the CDC autism is a group of developmental disabilities defined by significant impairments in social interaction and communication and presence of unusual behaviors and interests.
New Jersey, the state with the highest rate of autism, is already taking steps in the right direction, unlike Utah. A set of new bills will establish a statewide autism registry, restructure a state research and treatment council, train teachers in autism awareness, instruct physicians in early detection, create the task force on adult autism and provide money for research and treatment.
“As of February 2007, the Centers for Disease Control identified New Jersey as having the highest rate of autism incidence in the nation,” said New Jersey Senator Loretta Weinberg. “With our increased understanding of the spectrum of autism disorders comes the increased responsibility of providing a support system for families and individuals living with autism.”
This heightened sense of responsibility needs to be spanned across the nation, especially in those states with the highest rates. While there is no cure for the disease, intensive therapies including behavioral, occupational, speech and physical show promise in lessening the severity of the symptoms.
This is where the focus needs to be, this is where the successes will come. Speculating into different causes without scientific reasoning, and ignoring the severity of the issue is what our state doesn’t need. Our apathy on this issue will only make things worse. It is in your hands.
Opinion Editorial
Mandating HPV Vaccination in the Fight Against Cervical Cancer
If scientists discovered a vaccine to fight lung cancer, it would be hailed as a miracle. If researchers found a vaccine that would eliminate bone or liver cancer, surely lawmakers would quickly mandate vaccination. So, what’s the problem with vaccinating against cervical cancer?
A vaccine licensed under the brandname Gardasil® is nearly 100 percent effective in preventing the occurrence of four human papillomavirus (HPV) types, two of which account for 70 percent of all cervical cancers. Recent studies show that the vaccine may even be effective in preventing vulval and vaginal cancers.
With the potential to dramatically reduce cervical cancer and perhaps prevent other cancers, “this vaccine is unique and offers tremendous possibilities,” said Dr. Teresa Aguado, World Health Organization’s coordinator for the Initiative for Vaccine Research, Product Research, and Development team.
Therefore, Utahns must band together and encourage
While many Utahns may be concerned that vaccinating young girls against HPV, a sexually transmitted disease (STD), will promote promiscuity, they should recognize that half of all girls already become sexually active before graduating from high school. Even while gonorrhea rates are declining on the national level, the state of
State health officials say that an alarming number of high cases of STDs occur among
Additionally, about 20 percent of American girls between the ages of 14 and 19 are already infected with HPV, and 6.2 percent of 15-19 year-old girls become infected with HPV each year. But this battle is not really about HPV the STD; it’s about a cancer that is directly linked to a prevalent virus—a virus that can be prevented.
For decades, lawmakers have tried tirelessly to reduce lung cancer deaths by reducing smoking. With half of all sexually active people acquiring HPV at some point in their lives, why don’t lawmakers now try to reduce cervical cancer deaths by eliminating HPV starting with a mandatory vaccination? The opportunity is staring them in the face and it’s time to take it.
Wednesday, June 13, 2007
Rising STD Rates Show Utah’s Need For Gardasil
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH-- Despite what many Utah parents believe, Utah teens are in great need of the HPV vaccine, Gardasil. A majority of Utah parents disagree with CDC recommendations regarding the administrations of the HPV vaccination. Gardasil has been shrouded in controversy since its debut in June 2006, despite its protective qualities against cervical cancer.
Utah has been particularly unreceptive to Gardasil. Public health officials believe this resistance is partially due to the fact that many Utah parents refuse to believe that their teens engage in sexual behaviors. Utah is not the safe place parents presume it to be. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, nationwide, 49% of high school seniors have had sexual intercourse at least once, and 36% of teens are currently sexually active. While the statistics in Utah are slightly lower than the national average, Utah parents need to be aware of the growing need for the HPV vaccine. Rates of sexually transmitted diseases are increasing faster in Utah than in any other area of the country. On March 22, 2007 The Deseret Morning News reported that from 2000-2005, rates of chlamydia increased by 110%, and rates of gonorrhea increased by 195%. Chlamydia, gonorrhea and HPV are closely related to one another. Data from the CDC shows that 46% of women with HPV also have either chlamydia or gonorrhea. The skyrocketing rates of chlamydia and gonorrhea indicate that HPV is also on the rise. Although the rates of chlamydia and gonorrhea are still well below the national average in Utah, if the rates continue at their current pace, Utah will have one of the highest rates of infection per capita within the next ten years.
Because of the large increase in cases of chlamydia and gonorrhea, the rate of HPV will also dramatically increase in Utah within the next few years. Legislators are becoming aware of the problems. The 2007 session of the Utah Legislature included a bill, HB 358, concerning further education to teens about the dangers of unprotected sex, as well as the signs, symptoms and effects of HPV infection. HB 358 would have also provided state funds to financially assist those unable to afford the vaccination. The vote was spilt 4-4 and the bill was not approved. Representatives claim to have received emails from individuals requesting that the bill not pass. Individuals voiced two concerns over the passage of the bill. The main concern parents have is the age group recommended for immunization. The CDC recommends the vaccine for girls as
young as nine, listing the ideal ages for vaccination as 11-12. The reason for such a young recommendation is that sexual activity increases sharply at age 13. Because Gardasil is a preventative, not a curative measure, immunization must take place before sexual activity and subsequent infection occurs. The other concern that parents voiced is that teens would view Gardasil as a form of birth control. Gardasil only protects against HPV strains 6, 11, 16 and 17, it does not prevent pregnancy or protect against other sexual transmitted infections. Proper education in both the home and the school settings will help to ensure that teens have adequate information and help them use the vaccination for its intended purpose.
While education helps alleviate the problem, it does not eliminate it. The most pressing problem facing health educators is that sexual education does not occur young enough. Gardasil is recommended for girls ages 11-12, the reason being that sexual activity begins to dramatically increase at age 13. Gardasil, like most vaccines, is a preventative measure; it is not an effective treatment for an existing condition. In order to educate effectively in Utah schools, education about sexually transmitted infections must begin as young as the third grade.
Sexual activity in Utah is much greater and growing faster than most parents realize. This presents an urgent need for increased vaccination among Utah preteens. Sexual education must come earlier and be more straightforward in to prevent cervical cancer in Utah. More vaccinations and education will make a difference.
Utah has been particularly unreceptive to Gardasil. Public health officials believe this resistance is partially due to the fact that many Utah parents refuse to believe that their teens engage in sexual behaviors. Utah is not the safe place parents presume it to be. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, nationwide, 49% of high school seniors have had sexual intercourse at least once, and 36% of teens are currently sexually active. While the statistics in Utah are slightly lower than the national average, Utah parents need to be aware of the growing need for the HPV vaccine. Rates of sexually transmitted diseases are increasing faster in Utah than in any other area of the country. On March 22, 2007 The Deseret Morning News reported that from 2000-2005, rates of chlamydia increased by 110%, and rates of gonorrhea increased by 195%. Chlamydia, gonorrhea and HPV are closely related to one another. Data from the CDC shows that 46% of women with HPV also have either chlamydia or gonorrhea. The skyrocketing rates of chlamydia and gonorrhea indicate that HPV is also on the rise. Although the rates of chlamydia and gonorrhea are still well below the national average in Utah, if the rates continue at their current pace, Utah will have one of the highest rates of infection per capita within the next ten years.
Because of the large increase in cases of chlamydia and gonorrhea, the rate of HPV will also dramatically increase in Utah within the next few years. Legislators are becoming aware of the problems. The 2007 session of the Utah Legislature included a bill, HB 358, concerning further education to teens about the dangers of unprotected sex, as well as the signs, symptoms and effects of HPV infection. HB 358 would have also provided state funds to financially assist those unable to afford the vaccination. The vote was spilt 4-4 and the bill was not approved. Representatives claim to have received emails from individuals requesting that the bill not pass. Individuals voiced two concerns over the passage of the bill. The main concern parents have is the age group recommended for immunization. The CDC recommends the vaccine for girls as
young as nine, listing the ideal ages for vaccination as 11-12. The reason for such a young recommendation is that sexual activity increases sharply at age 13. Because Gardasil is a preventative, not a curative measure, immunization must take place before sexual activity and subsequent infection occurs. The other concern that parents voiced is that teens would view Gardasil as a form of birth control. Gardasil only protects against HPV strains 6, 11, 16 and 17, it does not prevent pregnancy or protect against other sexual transmitted infections. Proper education in both the home and the school settings will help to ensure that teens have adequate information and help them use the vaccination for its intended purpose.
While education helps alleviate the problem, it does not eliminate it. The most pressing problem facing health educators is that sexual education does not occur young enough. Gardasil is recommended for girls ages 11-12, the reason being that sexual activity begins to dramatically increase at age 13. Gardasil, like most vaccines, is a preventative measure; it is not an effective treatment for an existing condition. In order to educate effectively in Utah schools, education about sexually transmitted infections must begin as young as the third grade.
Sexual activity in Utah is much greater and growing faster than most parents realize. This presents an urgent need for increased vaccination among Utah preteens. Sexual education must come earlier and be more straightforward in to prevent cervical cancer in Utah. More vaccinations and education will make a difference.
Tuesday, June 5, 2007
Press Release: HPV Vaccine Debate
Utahns Debate About the HPV Vaccine
The human papillomavirus vaccine will soon arrive at the one-year approval mark by the FDA. Advocates champion the vaccine’s potential to prevent cancer, but opponents voice concern.
The human papillomavirus vaccine will soon arrive at the one-year approval mark by the FDA. Advocates champion the vaccine’s potential to prevent cancer, but opponents voice concern.
Salt Lake City, Utah (PRWEB) June 5, 2007—With the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine’s one-year anniversary just around the corner, some Utahns are celebrating the vaccine’s accomplishments while others are still questioning its social implications.
Even though the HPV vaccine may dramatically reduce the incidence of cervical cancer and possibly prevent other cancers,
Philanthropist Jon M. Huntsman Sr. responded by donating $1 million to the Utah Department of Health to initiate an HPV-cervical cancer awareness campaign and distribute HPV vaccines to uninsured and low-income women.
Despite Huntsman’s belief that "the lives of sisters and daughters, wives and mothers throughout
The pushback against HPV vaccination comes mostly from social conservatives who believe that immunizing young girls against HPV will promote promiscuity. Others repute this argument by reasoning that the vaccine protects against only one sexually transmitted disease and there are so many others to be worried about.
"I don't think it is a blank check for going out and having safe sex. There are definitely other sexually transmitted diseases,” said Karen Zempolich, a gynecologic oncologist who worked on the vaccine’s clinical trials at the Huntsman Cancer Institute.
Moreover, "cervical cancer is not a disease of sexual promiscuity; it's caused by a virus and we have a vaccine for this virus. It prevents cancer and can potentially save lives," said Kalynn Filion of the Utah Department of Health’s cancer program.
Because the HPV vaccine is the first of its kind developed to prevent cancer, numerous health professionals like Filion honor its accomplishments that have ensued since June 8, 2006 when the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) licensed the vaccine for use in females ages 9-26. By the end of 2006, the vaccine had been approved in 49 countries worldwide.
Numerous studies prove that the HPV vaccine, sold by Merck under the brandname Gardasil®, is nearly 100 percent effective in preventing the occurrence of HPV types 16 and 18, which account for 70 percent of all cervical cancers. Only recently have researchers begun to study the vaccine’s potential to eliminate vulval and vaginal cancers.
A study published in the British medical journal The Lancet last month shows that the vaccine was also 100 percent effective in preventing vulval and vaginal pre-cancerous lesions associated with these two HPV types.
Despite opposition against the HPV vaccine, many still agree that the potential of this vaccine to prevent cervical and other cancers requires thoughtful consideration: “Cancer knows no age, knows no race, it knows no gender. It can happen to anyone, and I just beg mothers out there to please research. Please find out all you can about the vaccination before you make up your mind,” pleaded Heather Burcham, a 31 year old dying of cervical cancer caused by HPV.
For more information about the HPV vaccine, please visit the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website.
# # #
Autism
PRESS RELEASE
Unknown Cause: Known Treatment
Immunizations not the cause of Autism, shown in the conclusive study carried out by the Center for Disease Control.
With rates of Autism on the rise questions about the cause of the disease has been swirling. One cause, lurking in the back of worried mothers minds, is about whether there is a relationship between autism and the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine and other vaccines. Several studies, done by several Federal agencies have looked at whether there is a relationship between vaccines and autism. The bulk of the evidence indicates that vaccines are not associated with autism.
Within a few years the rates have gone from 1 in 1500, to 1 in 150 children. Long ago, in 2000, Center for Disease Control (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) asked the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to organize an expert committee--Immunization Safety Review Committee--to review and report evidence about whether vaccines cause certain health problems.
The committee studied evidence about the theory that MMR vaccine causes autism and the theory that vaccines with the preservative thimerosal cause neurodevelopment disorders, including autism.
The conclusions from the committee were that neither thimerosal-containing vaccines or MMR vaccine are associated with autism. The hypothesis, regarding the link between autism and vaccines, lacks supporting evidence and was only theoretical.
Future efforts to find the cause of autism will be directed toward other lines of inquiry that are supported by current knowledge and evidence and offer more promise for providing an answer.
The CDC knows that some parents and others may still have concerns about this issue. CDC is committed to protecting the health of children and to identifying the biological and environmental causes of autism and other developmental disabilities, so we will continue to study the role of vaccines.
For more information on Autism visit the CDC website. http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/ or http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/faq_vaccines.htm
About CDC:
The CDC seeks to give people timely and accurate information about public health and Autism. They respond to requests for information from state and local agencies, health professionals, universities, and the general public.
# # #
How to post press releases and opinion editorials to this blog...
Where do I sign in?
The sign-in box is located in the upper-right corner of the Blogger homepage, where you can enter your username and password.
Can more than one person contribute to a single blog?
Yes. I have initiated "team blogs" for this purpose. This allows small groups of people to contribute to a single blog. Basically, one person initially creates the blog, then "invites" others to join it. You have been invited to participate in a team blog by email.
How do I post to my blog?
Once you've logged into Blogger you'll see your Dashboard, showing your list of blogs. Click the green 'plus' icon to create a new post.
Next, you'll see the Create New Post page. Start by giving your post a title (optional), then enter the post itself.
When you're done, click the "Preview" link to make sure it's ready to go.
Once you're satisfied with your post, click the "Publish" button. This will publish your new post.
The sign-in box is located in the upper-right corner of the Blogger homepage, where you can enter your username and password.
Can more than one person contribute to a single blog?
Yes. I have initiated "team blogs" for this purpose. This allows small groups of people to contribute to a single blog. Basically, one person initially creates the blog, then "invites" others to join it. You have been invited to participate in a team blog by email.
How do I post to my blog?
Once you've logged into Blogger you'll see your Dashboard, showing your list of blogs. Click the green 'plus' icon to create a new post.
Next, you'll see the Create New Post page. Start by giving your post a title (optional), then enter the post itself.
When you're done, click the "Preview" link to make sure it's ready to go.
Once you're satisfied with your post, click the "Publish" button. This will publish your new post.
Monday, April 23, 2007
California’s School Junk Food Ban Takes Effect
California's School Junk Food Ban Takes Effect
Legislation to reduce the amount of junk food and soft drinks sold in California schools will take effect on July 1, 2007, making California’s school nutrition standards the strongest in the nation.
Sacramento, California (PRWEB) June 25, 2007—California’s school junk food ban SB 12 will go into effect on July 1, limiting the fat content, sugar content and portion size of all foods sold on public school campuses.
“California is facing an obesity epidemic. Over the last decade Californians have gained 360 million pounds and one in every three of our children is overweight. This dangerous trend is unacceptable,” said Governor Schwarzenegger, one of the lead sponsors of the bill.
Additionally, California’s healthy beverages bill (SB 965) which will also take effect on July 1, will require that half of the beverages sold to high school students are fruit-based, vegetable-based, water, milk products, or electrolyte replacement beverages that contain no more than 42 grams of added sweetener per 20-ounce serving—therefore limiting the proportion of soft drinks sold to students.
With the junk food ban and healthy beverages bills poised to take effect, California’s public schools will soon have the strongest nutrition standards in the nation. "California has done more to promote healthy eating for students than at any other point in our state's history. We've reclaimed schools as institutions of education, rather than as marketplaces for junk food and soda vendors," said Dr. Harold Goldstein of the California Center for Public Health Advocacy (CCPHA), which helped advocate for the bills.
While many public health agencies including the American Cancer Society, the American Heart Association, the California Academy of Family Physicians, the California School Nutrition Association supported the bill, some advocacy groups, including The Association of Food, Beverage, and Consumer Beverage Products opposed it.
“We are disappointed that the State of California has decided to implement legislation that will provide no nutrition education while curtailing the authority of local school districts to decide what foods and beverages should be available to their students. Despite arguments to the contrary, our concern is that SB 12 and SB 965 will do little, if anything, to address the serious issue of obesity among children and young adults. This is especially true for high school students who can leave campus during lunch periods,” said Steve Arthur, Vice President of Government Affairs for the association.
Sponsors of the school junk food ban and healthy beverages bill hope that they will help increase students’ access to healthy foods and ultimately decrease the amount of overweight children in the state. Currently, in California, about one in three children and one in four teens is at risk or already overweight.
“California has set a new national standard for protecting children," said SB 965 and SB 12 author Senator. Martha Escutia. "Today we have taken a bold step in addressing the child health and obesity crisis. By addressing what is sold on school campuses, we have put control back in the hands of parents where it belongs."
For more information on the school junk food ban or health beverages bill, please visit the CCPHA website.
About CCPHA:
The California Center for Public Health Advocacy is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit organization founded by the California Public Health Association-North and the Southern California Public Health Association.
Contact:
FIRSTNAME LASTNAME
XYZ Company
Phone:###-###-####
Fax: ###-###-####
Email: XXXXXXX@gmail.com
Webstite: http://www.XXXXXXX.com
###
Legislation to reduce the amount of junk food and soft drinks sold in California schools will take effect on July 1, 2007, making California’s school nutrition standards the strongest in the nation.
Sacramento, California (PRWEB) June 25, 2007—California’s school junk food ban SB 12 will go into effect on July 1, limiting the fat content, sugar content and portion size of all foods sold on public school campuses.
“California is facing an obesity epidemic. Over the last decade Californians have gained 360 million pounds and one in every three of our children is overweight. This dangerous trend is unacceptable,” said Governor Schwarzenegger, one of the lead sponsors of the bill.
Additionally, California’s healthy beverages bill (SB 965) which will also take effect on July 1, will require that half of the beverages sold to high school students are fruit-based, vegetable-based, water, milk products, or electrolyte replacement beverages that contain no more than 42 grams of added sweetener per 20-ounce serving—therefore limiting the proportion of soft drinks sold to students.
With the junk food ban and healthy beverages bills poised to take effect, California’s public schools will soon have the strongest nutrition standards in the nation. "California has done more to promote healthy eating for students than at any other point in our state's history. We've reclaimed schools as institutions of education, rather than as marketplaces for junk food and soda vendors," said Dr. Harold Goldstein of the California Center for Public Health Advocacy (CCPHA), which helped advocate for the bills.
While many public health agencies including the American Cancer Society, the American Heart Association, the California Academy of Family Physicians, the California School Nutrition Association supported the bill, some advocacy groups, including The Association of Food, Beverage, and Consumer Beverage Products opposed it.
“We are disappointed that the State of California has decided to implement legislation that will provide no nutrition education while curtailing the authority of local school districts to decide what foods and beverages should be available to their students. Despite arguments to the contrary, our concern is that SB 12 and SB 965 will do little, if anything, to address the serious issue of obesity among children and young adults. This is especially true for high school students who can leave campus during lunch periods,” said Steve Arthur, Vice President of Government Affairs for the association.
Sponsors of the school junk food ban and healthy beverages bill hope that they will help increase students’ access to healthy foods and ultimately decrease the amount of overweight children in the state. Currently, in California, about one in three children and one in four teens is at risk or already overweight.
“California has set a new national standard for protecting children," said SB 965 and SB 12 author Senator. Martha Escutia. "Today we have taken a bold step in addressing the child health and obesity crisis. By addressing what is sold on school campuses, we have put control back in the hands of parents where it belongs."
For more information on the school junk food ban or health beverages bill, please visit the CCPHA website.
About CCPHA:
The California Center for Public Health Advocacy is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit organization founded by the California Public Health Association-North and the Southern California Public Health Association.
Contact:
FIRSTNAME LASTNAME
XYZ Company
Phone:###-###-####
Fax: ###-###-####
Email: XXXXXXX@gmail.com
Webstite: http://www.XXXXXXX.com
###
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
